Immune thrombocytopenia

Compared within 2 studies that had both: 45 people with immune thrombocytopenia and 46 healthy people. No genera less common in people with immune thrombocytopenia, and 6 more common.

A difference is an association: it doesn’t mean these genera cause, prevent or treat immune thrombocytopenia. GMrepo reports this group at the genus level only, so these are genera, not species.

Phylum

Searching opens both lists and shows only matching rows.

Less common in immune thrombocytopenia · 0

Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 people Strongest first · Each figure is 10 people

None compared.

More common in immune thrombocytopenia · 6

Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 people Strongest first · Each figure is 10 people
  1. Streptococcus genus in 2 studies Healthy 74% immune thrombocytopenia 100%
  2. Weissella genus in 2 studies Healthy 6.4% immune thrombocytopenia 42%
  3. Lactococcus genus in 2 studies Healthy 2.2% immune thrombocytopenia 29%
  4. Klebsiella genus in 2 studies Healthy 20% immune thrombocytopenia 56%
  5. Rothia genus in 2 studies Healthy 6.5% immune thrombocytopenia 33%

Where these numbers come from

Studies
Only GMrepo projects that had people with the condition and healthy people, 10 or more of each. Numbers come from those studies, never from pooling.Sampled in China.
How common
The share of people whose sample has any of it, in the people with the condition and in the healthy people of those same studies. Tested within studies (Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel, corrected for testing many microbes); a difference counts when it is clear and meaningful (Cohen’s h of 0.2 or more).
Strength word
Counted by code from how many studies point the same way: Seen again and again (3 or more, none clearly the other way), Seen more than once (2, the majority), Seen once (1, listed last). Where studies disagree, a row isn’t listed.
Each study
Tap a row for every study’s own numbers, and for how much carriers have.
Analysis
Our analysis of GMrepo data. GMrepo on Data sources · Read the rules

Also compared · 111 genera

Compared within studies that had both, but not listed above.

No meaningful difference · 111

PubMed · human studies and reviews first

Recent research

All research on it
  1. PubMed ↗
  2. PubMed ↗

Source: PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2 linked papers, last 10 years