probiome Sign in
← Conditions Digestive system Genus-level

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Compared within 2 studies that had both: 27 people with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and 28 healthy people. No genera less common in people with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and 3 more common.

A difference is an association: it doesn’t mean these genera cause, prevent or treat intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. GMrepo reports this group at the genus level only, so these are genera, not species.

Phylum

Searching opens both lists and shows only matching rows.

Less common in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy · 0

Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 people Strongest first · Each figure is 10 people

None compared.

More common in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy · 3

Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 people Strongest first · Each figure is 10 people
  1. Parabacteroides genus in 2 studies Healthy 45% intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy 89%
  2. Flavonifractor genus in 2 studies Healthy 27% intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy 74%
  3. Oscillibacter genus in 2 studies Healthy 27% intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy 67%

Where these numbers come from

Studies
Only GMrepo projects that had people with the condition and healthy people, 10 or more of each. Numbers come from those studies, never from pooling.Sampled in China.
How common
The share of people whose sample has any of it, in the people with the condition and in the healthy people of those same studies. Tested within studies (Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel, corrected for testing many microbes); a difference counts when it is clear and meaningful (Cohen’s h of 0.2 or more).
Strength word
Counted by code from how many studies point the same way: Seen again and again (3 or more, none clearly the other way), Seen more than once (2, the majority), Seen once (1, listed last). Where studies disagree, a row isn’t listed.
Each study
Tap a row for every study’s own numbers, and for how much carriers have.
Analysis
Our analysis of GMrepo data. GMrepo on Data sources · Read the rules

Also compared · 49 genera

Compared within studies that had both, but not listed above.

Studies disagree · 4

No meaningful difference · 45
PubMed · human studies and reviews first

Recent research

No recent human studies or reviews yet. Search PubMed for this condition ↗