Calicivirus infections

Compared within 1 study that had both: 31 people with calicivirus infections and 25 healthy people. 20 genera are less common in people with calicivirus infections, and 3 more common.

A difference is an association: it doesn’t mean these genera cause, prevent or treat calicivirus infections. GMrepo reports this group at the genus level only, so these are genera, not species.

Phylum

Searching opens both lists and shows only matching rows.

Less common in calicivirus infections · 20

Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 people Strongest first · Each figure is 10 people
  1. Eubacterium genus in 1 study Healthy 100% calicivirus infections 9.7%
  2. Blautia genus in 1 study Healthy 100% calicivirus infections 19%
  3. Turicibacter genus in 1 study Healthy 64% calicivirus infections 0%
  4. Romboutsia genus in 1 study Healthy 84% calicivirus infections 6.5%
  5. Faecalibacterium genus in 1 study Healthy 100% calicivirus infections 39%

More common in calicivirus infections · 3

Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 people Strongest first · Each figure is 10 people
  1. Acinetobacter genus in 1 study Healthy 0% calicivirus infections 32%
  2. Rothia genus in 1 study Healthy 8.0% calicivirus infections 58%
  3. Enterococcus genus in 1 study Healthy 8.0% calicivirus infections 52%

Where these numbers come from

Studies
Only GMrepo projects that had people with the condition and healthy people, 10 or more of each. Numbers come from those studies, never from pooling.Sampled in China.
How common
The share of people whose sample has any of it, in the people with the condition and in the healthy people of those same studies. Tested within studies (Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel, corrected for testing many microbes); a difference counts when it is clear and meaningful (Cohen’s h of 0.2 or more).
Strength word
Counted by code from how many studies point the same way: Seen again and again (3 or more, none clearly the other way), Seen more than once (2, the majority), Seen once (1, listed last). Where studies disagree, a row isn’t listed.
Each study
Tap a row for every study’s own numbers, and for how much carriers have.
Analysis
Our analysis of GMrepo data. GMrepo on Data sources · Read the rules
PubMed · human studies and reviews first

Recent research

All research on it
  1. PubMed ↗
  2. PubMed ↗

Source: PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2 linked papers, last 10 years