genus · NCBI 1835
Saccharopolyspora
Species1
Products0 across its species
Samples29
The genus
Species in this genus
| Species | Healthy guts ↓ 0–100% | Products |
|---|---|---|
 Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula | 0 | |
| Across the genus | 0 |
* Counted in the same healthy people as the species (whole-genome samples). All bars use the same 0–100% scale. A product with two Saccharopolyspora species counts once in the genus total.
What they are
A C G T Its species' DNA
Shortest we have Mycoplasmoides genitalium 0.6M
⋮ 1,616 shorter than any Saccharopolyspora
⋮ 735 longer than any Saccharopolyspora
Longest we have Bradyrhizobium altum 9.8M
Saccharopolyspora’s one genome we have is 4.0M: large for gut microbes.
One reference genome per species; strains vary.
Their ID genes, lined up: shared stretches form solid stripes
Fewer than two of its species have a reference ID-gene sequence in NCBI yet, so there's nothing to line up Data sources
From its species' genomes and lab tests
What its species can do
A species counts when most of its strains can. Not measured in anyone's gut.
- Can ferment fiber 1 of 1 species S. rectivirgula
What’s typical · a description, not a comparison
In healthy guts
Not found in the healthy people we have. Our healthy numbers come from whole-genome samples, which name species. Saccharopolyspora is only seen in 16S samples, which read genera differently, so it isn’t counted here.
Compared within studies that had both
In conditions
Compared with healthy people in the same studies, it’s less common in none and more common in 1 condition. Only studies that had both are counted.
A difference is an association: it doesn’t mean this microbe causes, prevents or treats any of these.
Strongest first, then the biggest gap · Each figure is 10 peoplePubMed · human studies and reviews first
Recent research
No recent human studies or reviews yet. Probiome follows PubMed for the few hundred most-studied microbes; rarer species often only show up in large surveys. Search PubMed for this genus ↗